Silence=Acceptance | Are you remaining silent? Then you are part of the problem!
NASA Says No 2012 Doomsday, But Preppers Have Other Worries
Written by SAM ROLLEY Personal Liberty Digest Friday, 27 January 2012 17:27
NASA has posted a frequently asked questions section on its website seeking to quiet talk about 2012 being a year of catastrophic disaster for the planet Earth.
Many preppers have explored possibilities of disaster scenarios that could play out in 2012 based on information from ancient texts, celestial observations or simply the general state of world affairs. Though there were numerous social and natural disastersin 2011 that have led many people to believe a massive catastrophe is looming, scientists at NASA say that 2012 doomsday theories are false in a recently released FAQs section, “2012: The Beginning of the End or Why the World Won’t End.”
“There apparently is a great deal of interest in celestial bodies, and their locations and trajectories at the end of the calendar year 2012. Now, I for one love a good book or movie as much as the next guy. But the stuff flying around through cyberspace, TV and the movies is not based on science. There is even a fake NASA news release out there,” says a statement from NASA senior research scientist Don Yeomans.
While the planet may not be in imminent danger this year, many people say the outlook for 2012 appears to be filled with the possibility of widespread military conflict, growing protests throughout the world, more global economic failures and further evidence of government’s inability to function in the way in which it was intended.
Continue reading @ Personal Liberty DigestGingrich, Romney clash over immigration, Freddie Mac, moon
Last Updated on Thursday, 26 January 2012 21:38 Written by By Rachel Streitfeld and Adam Aigner-Treworgy, CNN Thursday, 26 January 2012 21:23
KUDOS, SANTORUM!!! I'm glad he made the following point, because we are getting VERY tired of the petty personal politics during these debates! I'm interested in the candidates' policies and agenda for America and who has the chutzpa to defeat Obama, not their bank accounts or how many wives they've had. America is in crisis -- who will best lead us off the precipice before we fall into the abyss. ~~beez
Excerpt: . . . For his turn, Santorum launched into a screed against the personal turn the campaign has taken of late, asking that the debate shift back to the issues facing the country rather than the financial dealings of two candidates.
"The bigger issue here is, these two gentlemen, who are out distracting from the most important issues -- we have been playing petty personal politics, can we set aside that Newt was a member of Congress and used the skills that he developed as a member of Congress to go out and advise companies -- and that's not the worst thing in the world -- and that Mitt Romney is a wealthy guy because worked hard and he's going out and working hard? And you guys should leave that alone and focus on the issues." . . .
IS THIS THE REASON OBAMA SAID 'NO' TO THE KEYSTONE PIPELINE?
Written by MIKE OPELKA The Blaze Thursday, 26 January 2012 11:51
Smells of MORE corruption to me!!! ~~beez
In rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project this past week, the Obama administration did exactly what they told everyone they were going to do.
The question many are asking is, “Why?”
Why did the President kill the pipeline deal that so many Democrats, Republicans and labor union leaders support?
Was it done because:
A. – As the administration has said publicly, there is not enough time to do a proper environmental impact study?
B. – Thanks to alternative energy companies like Solyndra, we’re on the path to becoming an oil-free energy generating country?
C. – Billionaire Warren Buffett (and Obama advisor) has an investment in a Canadian railway that would benefit from killing Keystone?
D. – Is it because Brazil, the country whose deep-water oil fields we agreed to fund, is going to be selling us cheap and plentiful oil?
Continue reading @ The Blaze
More Articles...
Page 1 of 109
